Dave Asprey's Substack

Dave Asprey's Substack

The Boring Diet Hack That Slows Aging Better Than Most Supplements

A two-year study just proved what Blue Zones already knew: eat less, age slower. Get the step-by-step guide here.

Nov 24, 2025
∙ Paid

Stop looking for the magic pill. The National Institute on Aging just spent years proving what your grandmother could have told you: eating slightly less food slows down biological aging.

Not starvation. Not juice cleanses. Not intermittent fasting performed like a religious ritual. Just eating about 12% fewer calories consistently over time.

The results? Measurable slowdown in biological aging across multiple systems. Better insulin sensitivity. Improved blood pressure. Enhanced cognitive resilience. And here’s the kicker - it worked whether people started lean or carrying a few extra pounds.

This is the first serious human trial showing you can tap the brakes on aging without joining a monastery or eating lettuce and sadness for two years.

The CALERIE Study: What Actually Happened

The Comprehensive Assessment of Long-term Effects of Reducing Intake of Energy (CALERIE) Phase 2 trial tracked 220 healthy adults for two years. Researchers at Columbia University and the National Institute on Aging randomized participants 2:1 to either calorie restriction or normal eating.

The target was 25% calorie reduction. Real-world adherence delivered about 12% - much closer to what motivated people can actually maintain without wrecking their hormones, metabolism, or social life.

The population wasn’t metabolically broken. These were lean or slightly overweight adults, young to middle-aged, without major health issues. This matters because it means the intervention works even when you’re not starting from rock bottom.

The primary aging metric was DunedinPACE - a DNA methylation biomarker that functions like a speedometer for biological aging. It measures how many “biological years” you age per chronological year.

The result: Calorie restriction slowed the pace of aging by 2-3% according to DunedinPACE. That translates to roughly 10-15% reduction in mortality risk - similar in magnitude to quitting smoking.

Read that again. The same mortality benefit as quitting smoking from eating a couple hundred fewer calories per day.

Why This Isn’t Your Typical Diet Study

Most diet research is garbage. Short-term weight loss. Cherry-picked populations. Interventions nobody could maintain past January 15th.

CALERIE is different:

Duration matters. Two full years, not two weeks. Long enough to see sustained physiological adaptation, not just water weight and glycogen depletion.

Real adherence numbers. They targeted 25% restriction but got 12% in practice. This is honest science acknowledging what actually happens when humans try to follow protocols outside a lab.

Rich biomarker set. Not just weight on a scale. Methylation clocks, metabolic markers, cardiovascular parameters, inflammatory markers. The full aging picture.

Sustainable restriction. The NIA explicitly emphasizes that modest, long-term reductions integrate into normal life. This isn’t punishment - it’s adjustment.

Think Blue Zones logic validated in a controlled trial. Small, consistent lifestyle patterns that compound over decades beat heroic interventions that flame out in months.

The Speedometer vs. The Odometer

Here’s where the science gets interesting.

DunedinPACE moved significantly. Two other popular aging clocks - PhenoAge and GrimAge - didn’t budge much over the two-year window.

Why? Different clocks measure different things.

DunedinPACE is the speedometer. It tracks how fast you’re aging right now. Calorie restriction slowed that speed by 2-3%.

PhenoAge and GrimAge are the odometer. They measure lifetime accumulated damage. Two years isn’t long enough to see major shifts in total mileage when you’ve already been driving for 30-40 years.

The speedometer changed. Give it another decade and the odometer will follow.

The Mechanism: Why Eating Less Works

Calorie restriction triggers multiple beneficial pathways simultaneously:

Improved metabolic efficiency. Better insulin sensitivity and glucose handling. Lower fasting insulin. Reduced HOMA-IR scores across the board in CALERIE analyses.

Cardiovascular improvements. Small but meaningful reductions in blood pressure. Improved lipid profiles. Less work for your heart means longer functional lifespan.

Lower systemic inflammation. Reduced C-reactive protein and inflammatory cytokines in subsets of participants. Not dramatic, but consistent.

Enhanced cellular stress response. Animal studies show CR upregulates autophagy, improves mitochondrial efficiency, and modulates nutrient sensing pathways like mTOR, AMPK, and sirtuins. The human methylation data aligns with slower multi-system deterioration.

The simple version: Eat a bit less, and your body spends more time repairing than over-processing fuel.


Want the full protocol for implementing moderate calorie restriction without tanking your hormones, losing muscle, or feeling miserable? The rest of this analysis includes specific calorie targets, protein timing strategies, cycling patterns to prevent metabolic adaptation, and how to stack this with other longevity interventions for maximum effect.

Upgrade to paid subscription.

This post is for paid subscribers

Already a paid subscriber? Sign in
© 2025 Dave Asprey
Privacy ∙ Terms ∙ Collection notice
Start your SubstackGet the app
Substack is the home for great culture